In matters of foreign policy, vice presidents frequently follow the political path. On US policy in the Middle East, however, Harris has been remarkably vocal. She voiced worry over the extent of misery experienced by people in Gaza during a speech she gave in Dubai in December following meetings with the governors of numerous Arab states. “What has happened in Gaza over the past 10 months is devastating. So many innocent lives lost. Desperate, hungry people fleeing for safety, over and over again. The scale of suffering is heartbreaking.” Harris stated
Harris and President Biden are still advocating for a cease-fire agreement that would liberate the captives and put a stop to the violence in Gaza. “They must open new borders for aid,” Harris said. “They must not impose any unnecessary restrictions on the delivery of aid. They must ensure humanitarian personnel, sites and convoys are not targeted. And they must work to restore basic services and promote order in Gaza so more food, water and fuel can reach those in need.”
Kamala Harris has taken an even-handed view on the Gaza crisis, highlighting her belief for Israel’s right to self-defense and the need to confront urgent issues in Gaza. She has supported actions to protect civilian safety and advance a two-state solution while denouncing Hamas’ actions of violence and bloodshed. Harris’s strategy is in line with advancing peace in the Middle East and sustaining healthy ties between the United States and Israel.
When Harris and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met in July , Harris declared that while she had an “unwavering commitment to Israel,” she also “will not be silent” over the critical problems in Gaza. “We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering. And I will not be silent.”
“It is time for this war to end and end in a way where Israel is secure, all the hostages are released, the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can exercise their right to freedom, dignity and self-determination,” Harris said.Kamala Harris’s perspective on the Gaza crisis reflects her larger foreign policy thinking, aiming to strike a balance between basic human rights and aid for allies. Her attitude will probably remain a topic of discussion if she wins , which will affect her likability to different voter demographics. Her subtle attitude on the controversy may win her over to those who prefer a more fair strategy, but it also runs the danger of losing others who hold strong opinions.
Trump’s opinion on the Gaza war is currently a major part of the campaign’s plot as the 2024 presidential election draws near. Determining the course of politics involves evaluating how Trump’s positions differ from Vice President Kamala Harris’s and considering how this could affect the election.
Trump showed a great deal of favor for Israel while in office, giving this partnership top priority in his foreign policy decisions. He supported moves that were perceived as supporting Israeli interests, like the U.S. embassy being relocated to Jerusalem and the capital city of Israel being acknowledged. “I’m not sure that I’m loving the way they’re doing it, because you’ve got to have victory,” Trump said. “You have to have a victory, and it’s taking a long time.”
Trump has reaffirmed his support for Israel in past remarks, stressing the need for the US to take a tough position against Hamas and to strongly back Israel’s right to self-defense. He has claimed that a harder posture is required to confront what he sees as challenges to Israeli defense and has attacked the Biden administration’s more moderate position as not being enough in favor of Israel. Trump told reporters at a press conference. “It has to get over with fast. … Get your victory and get it over with. It has to stop, the killing has to stop.”
Trump added: “I will give Israel the support that it needs to win but I do want them to win fast.” Following the attack by Hamas, Trump pledged to fully help israel. He was also originally skeptical of Netanyahu and Israeli intellect, labeling them ill-prepared – but he easily stopped on his comments and stated he sided with Netanyahu, whom he is tightly associated with as president. He stated in march that he stayed behind the Israeli attack on Gaza, but he asked the government to “finish up” the conflict soon since aid was slipping.
Trump’s foreign policy narrative centers on hostile tactics against enemies and resolute, constant backing for allies. This includes his views on the Gaza conflict. Those who prefer negotiation and solving problems may hate this strategy, but voters who support strong US governance may find appeal in it.
Voters that place a high value on solid encouragement for Israel and a firm stance against Hamas are likely to find Trump’s platform desirable. Nonetheless, it can also enrage others who support a more cautious international stance and worry about the conflict’s moral effects. How these changes among voters unfold will determine how Trump’s position affects his chances of winning the presidency.
